From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <2c4856dc13ebea1ee1199551bf83b363@quintile.net>
From: "Steve Simon" <steve@quintile.net>
Date: Thu,  3 Feb 2011 21:32:24 +0000
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikL6=MJEX+vGvG+3YDxFmrwL=DjF6ZQ7NjeONFJ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Modern development language for Plan 9,
	WAS: Re: RESOLVED: recoving important header file rudely
Topicbox-Message-UUID: abddbd48-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> > I don't know if f2c meets your needs, but it has always worked.
>
>
> As compared to modern fortran compilers, it is basically a toy.
>

But he did say some of his source is in ratfor,
I am pretty sure f2c would be happy with ratfor's output.

years ago I supported the pafec FE package - tens of thousands of lines
of Fortran. All the additions I made I did in ratfor, quite a reasonable
language (compared to F77) I thought.

-Steve