From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <2c6647ce10a71170c62e6cb498e0dbd6@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 06:32:01 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] nanosleep()?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3b7f0416-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> For a first pass, you could create a nanosleep for plan 9 that rounds
> to milliseconds and then use sleep()

Sounds like a plan, because the man page for nanosleep() expects the
underlying resolution to be implemented.  The complexities of "does
not interact with signals" can probably be ignored until further
notice for present purposes.  Being able to resume may take a bit of
effort.

++L