From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <2deffac0343cb6748d626133d2d960d4@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Date: Tue,  3 Dec 2013 06:32:37 +0200
From: lucio@proxima.alt.za
In-Reply-To: <9e4fad988f611729bb064703d636be14@coraid.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Go and 21-bit runes (and a bit of Go status)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8f5bfa8e-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> all this is moot unless we can get plan 9 integrated into go's automatic
> build system.  is this doable?  i have resources to make this happen if
> it is.

Let's take note of this, because 9atom certainly deserves attention in
this situation.  I'm trying to wrap my mind around the Go builder and
it would seem to me that even though the platforms are different, we
could categorise builders under the plan 9 label.  If that's the case,
then at least we can get a bird's eye view of progress if enough
contributors take part.

++L