9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lucio@proxima.alt.za
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] RFNOMNT
Date: Mon,  5 Jan 2009 06:01:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e6cd4e38012de49c219b75cb3ea43c6@proxima.alt.za> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9dfb8142e0854a5296a30265d66045e@9netics.com>

> i understood what Russ said to mean: patches -- for enhancements that
> "might" someday have a use or fixes that remove some perceived
> shortcoming lacking an actual need -- are scary.

Not if they are first discussed in the type of forum that is savvy to
both the immediate effects and the hidden long term consequences.  I
think that was a misguided generalisation.  If I had it at my
fingertip, I would quote R.A. Heinlein's comment about democracy and
dictatorship.

I'd be curious to hear the Plan 9 developers' take on how significant
they deem contributions from us peanut gallery, sometimes it seems
they very much prefer us all to just go away, as Uriel seems to
suggest.  Other times they seem positively thrilled to have us around.
A more consistent policy would be a lot easier to work with, whichever
side it took.

++L

PS: Of course, Russ does not represent all Plan 9 developers (I have a
feeling and a deep respect for the fact that he may well often be the
sole heir to the title of Plan 9 developer :-) and I am a very
reluctant critic of someone whose contributions appear to have
single-handedly shaped Plan 9.  I'm sure that his outburst was nothing
more than reaction under stressing circumstances.




  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-05  4:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-04  7:08 RFNOMNT Russ Cox
2009-01-04 12:21 ` [9fans] RFNOMNT lucio
2009-01-04 17:04   ` Russ Cox
2009-01-04 18:27     ` lucio
2009-01-04 16:12 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-05  1:01 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-05  4:18   ` Skip Tavakkolian
2009-01-05  4:01     ` lucio [this message]
2009-01-05  5:48   ` Russ Cox
2009-01-07  6:24 ` [9fans] RFNOMNT and/or "least privilege" Dave Eckhardt
2009-01-07 13:15   ` sqweek
2009-01-08 19:29   ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-08 19:57     ` Charles Forsyth
2009-01-08 19:45       ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-01-08 20:11         ` Charles Forsyth
2009-01-08 21:29       ` Roman V. Shaposhnik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2e6cd4e38012de49c219b75cb3ea43c6@proxima.alt.za \
    --to=lucio@proxima.alt.za \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).