From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <2e6e189cce0606e939a49a2f1691ece0@terzarima.net> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] XML From: Charles Forsyth Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 18:02:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60705250803r12e1f0b3xec5b88b6308da1ea@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: 71b6b98e-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > On 5/22/07, Charles Forsyth wrote: >> > However, we're still experimenting with this and I think that just >> > placing a "toc" file >> >> i think just using s-expressions would do the trick, and be much easier to read. i was referring specifically to nemo's application, although it's often true in general. s-expressions can look reasonably attractive, and double-clicking works on them. you can't say either about xml. certainly most xml i've seen makes me think i'm dyslexic. it also looks constipated, and two health problems in one standard is just too much.