From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 18:21:48 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <2eae1c26ce6c2c64c6903167e0c9d6dc@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAGMcHPoybfxpzuXQwF3A4O3QuFw2=aSzb-Xc_RKFqFvBWv51mw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGMcHProJzuTbY7rbK6RrA+1=82R1TPCzRrjOQ6zEC0QtYNEJg@mail.gmail.com>
	<bfacb292f0ee4a7fd501140a32aed25f@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<CAGMcHPoybfxpzuXQwF3A4O3QuFw2=aSzb-Xc_RKFqFvBWv51mw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Missing /dev/etherX ?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: da0c4930-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> bind -a '#l1' /net
> >
> That has indeed done it, thanks!
>
> Out of curiosity, what is it that is binding the first one automatically
> and not the second?
> It that just the standard behavior, or is it perhaps a script that was
> generated during installation with only one bind entry?

see /lib/namespace.  also, remember that the second interface is
very often put in a second ip stack on /net.alt.

- erik