From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 19:55:27 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <2fc416f4c3c3e59f7cc18b5c724989c6@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=v5XSLoMBWO2uOxq1HsS-kF4gE_w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <255556ff42dac9585ddf5e7f766d7175@hamnavoe.com>
	<20110421211046.C474DB835@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<9482032322d5daaadceace1f6875dad3@coraid.com>
	<BANLkTi=v5XSLoMBWO2uOxq1HsS-kF4gE_w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Q: moving directories? hard links?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d22280e2-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> > that certainly does seem like the hard way to do things.
> > why should the structure of the data depend on where it's
> > located?  certainly ken's fs doesn't change the format of
> > the worm if you concatinate several devices for the worm
> > or use just one.
>
> This would be a long discussion :-)
>
> best bet is to read Gibson's stuff.

could you please clarify?  i'm not following along.

- erik