9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] factotum/802.1x catch 22?
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 05:11:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2fc6400ff641ff1218a99159e6201fa3@coraid.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9321241f7154cd4cd7fab6579c8916b0@proxima.alt.za>

let's not.

right now shouldn't be the enemy of right.
and voting is no substitue for deliberation.

- erik

On Thu Mar 22 00:53:55 EDT 2007, lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote:
> *** Off Topic ***
> 
> I had a brief chat with "patch" and it strikes me now that the delay
> in accepting complex patches might be alleviated if such patches could
> be reviewed by 9fans, that is to say, publicly, by request.  Say, for
> example, that we are asked to comment on Axel's patch and we return a
> verdict, as part of the "patch" process.  No need to publish the
> request, those interested can look on sources and post the result
> there.
> 
> Two factors would seem important: usefulness as well as correctness.
> Maybe on a scale of 1 to 5.  I don't know if I'm skilled enough to
> alter patch/* accordingly, but I could try.
> 
> ++L


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-03-22  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-19 13:47 Axel Belinfante
2007-03-20 13:44 ` erik quanstrom
2007-03-21 23:03 ` Axel Belinfante
2007-03-22  4:38   ` lucio
2007-03-22  5:19     ` Uriel
2007-03-22  6:13       ` Noah Evans
2007-03-22  9:11     ` erik quanstrom [this message]
2007-03-22 15:31       ` Joel C. Salomon
2007-03-25 11:56     ` Axel Belinfante
2007-03-25 12:12       ` Uriel
2007-03-25 14:48         ` lucio
2007-03-25 20:38           ` Charles Forsyth
2007-03-26  6:51             ` lucio
2007-03-27  9:24               ` Charles Forsyth
2007-03-27 17:29                 ` lucio
2007-03-25 15:40         ` erik quanstrom
2007-03-25 16:44           ` lucio
2007-03-25 20:15           ` Axel Belinfante
2007-03-25 14:46       ` lucio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2fc6400ff641ff1218a99159e6201fa3@coraid.com \
    --to=quanstro@coraid.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).