From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <2fc6400ff641ff1218a99159e6201fa3@coraid.com>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 05:11:18 -0400
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] factotum/802.1x catch 22?
In-Reply-To: <9321241f7154cd4cd7fab6579c8916b0@proxima.alt.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2daecb46-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

let's not.

right now shouldn't be the enemy of right.
and voting is no substitue for deliberation.

- erik

On Thu Mar 22 00:53:55 EDT 2007, lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote:
> *** Off Topic ***
> 
> I had a brief chat with "patch" and it strikes me now that the delay
> in accepting complex patches might be alleviated if such patches could
> be reviewed by 9fans, that is to say, publicly, by request.  Say, for
> example, that we are asked to comment on Axel's patch and we return a
> verdict, as part of the "patch" process.  No need to publish the
> request, those interested can look on sources and post the result
> there.
> 
> Two factors would seem important: usefulness as well as correctness.
> Maybe on a scale of 1 to 5.  I don't know if I'm skilled enough to
> alter patch/* accordingly, but I could try.
> 
> ++L