From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <2fdbfe2bc3cca3406c03d835c01b2919@mail.gmx.net> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Newbie question From: sretzki@gmx.de Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 10:17:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8764cn8hsi.fsf@jorgito.magma.com.ni> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Topicbox-Message-UUID: ed9965e8-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > Hello! >=20 > I don't like the mouse very much either. I use it for placing windows > and have learned just the basics for working with rio windows and > acme until now. >=20 > with "vt" you can put a rio terminal into "vt100" mode, and "ape/psh" > gives you a Korn Shell, however without emacs and vi editing modes. >=20 > Maybe you can get these modes back into psh and feel at home then. >=20 Or you just learn the idea behind it all. This 'oh my gawd I must touch a= mouse!?!?!?'-drama constantly occuring in the so-called unix-community i= s at least funny, but can quickly become annoying. >=20 > Markus Sonderegger writes: >=20 >> Hello! >> >> Thank your for your answers. I've installed Plan9 and tryed rio and >> you're right it's much better than other guis. But it absolut not suit= s >> my workstyle. Normaly I doesen't use the mouse. >> >> What's the idea behind the desicion to have no console? I've read most >> of the documention papgers but can't figure it out. > ... >=20 > The kernel has a minimal console. It lacks an interrupt key for job > control. rio uses the Del key for job control. I think it is better > to let a userspace application do job control, and not to code > functionality for an interrupt key into the kernel. >=20 > If I remember correctly, the vt220 terminals had a mode for switching > sessions, similar to the virtual consoles in Linux. With some > programming effort it may be possible to open one single maximized > window at startup in rio, with a vt220 emulation and a similar > functionality. >=20 >=20 > Jorge-Le=C3=B3n