From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20010128104427.014da910@mail.real.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: "Fariborz 'Skip' Tavakkolian" <fst@real.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010127215828.D7A06199D5@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: [9fans] 9P to 9P2000 migration path
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 10:44:27 -0800
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 53bb47aa-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

This is great news; Thanks for including us early
on this. There is always a risk of getting bogus
feedback because the nuances may be missed.
The next question may be one of those :-)

What is the migration strategy for 9P to 9P2000? Is
there consideration given to operating a network in
mixed mode (9P/9P2000) and what it would take to
do so? Is there a provision for protocol versioning?

Thanks.