From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20011003220651.016c5c90@mail.real.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu, 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: Skip Tavakkolian <fst@real.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] dhcpd and /lib/ndb/local
In-Reply-To: <20011003101149.96D53199DD@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed,  3 Oct 2001 22:06:51 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: fcfab5f8-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

I tried it. My limited testing shows that it works. Thanks.

At 11:16 AM 10/3/2001 +0100, forsyth@vitanuova.com wrote:
>it's not documented, but it seems you can use
>	ip/dhcpd [dhcpd-options] addr0 n0 [addr1 n1 ...]
>to allocate n0 addresses starting with addr0, n1 from addr1, etc.
>
>it uses similarly named files in /lib/ndb/dhcp to track them.
>
>addresses are allocated only if there isn't a static binding in ndb.
>it also tries to check that any dynamic address is not still in use.
>
>does it work?
>i don't know.  i haven't tried it myself.
>
>