From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <30aff52398d26ce05f79da73b86be92e@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] telnet
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org>
In-Reply-To: <3a5d3236cc9d248d5bf026803f158963@collyer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 10:42:55 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 696d6034-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> I'm still using IL to the original file server.  At least until I've
> beaten on fossil for a long time and had it not fail, I'm sticking to
> Ken's.  A failed fossil may be easy to reinitialiase, with its data in
> venti, but that's not really good enough for unattended operation.  I
> may also want to continue using optical jukeboxes, so there's some
> code to move to user-land from Ken's fs.

Our file system runs mostly unattended. I admit a cron reboots it
once a week, but that's for safety :-)