From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <319dbda3ab7244d45bb568fb26e32b39@gmx.de>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Date: Wed,  2 Mar 2011 02:08:22 +0100
From: cinap_lenrek@gmx.de
In-Reply-To: <cf3d1dd11e4d7e04d765c02bf1163de6@brasstown.quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="upas-zvkrcqalyrfgwwrkrwirtdcfka"
Subject: Re: [9fans] realemu
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b628971e-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--upas-zvkrcqalyrfgwwrkrwirtdcfka
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

no, speed was never a concern for realemu.

--
cinap

--upas-zvkrcqalyrfgwwrkrwirtdcfka
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: <9fans-bounces@9fans.net>
Delivered-To: GMX delivery to cinap_lenrek@gmx.de
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Mar 2011 01:02:43 -0000
Received: from mail.9fans.net (EHLO mail.9fans.net) [67.207.142.3]
  by mx0.gmx.net (mx034) with SMTP; 02 Mar 2011 02:02:43 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[67.207.142.3])
	by mail.9fans.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <9fans-bounces@9fans.net>)
	id 1PuaYv-00038q-M0; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:09:09 +0000
Received: from ladd.quanstro.net ([69.55.170.73])
	by mail.9fans.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <quanstro@quanstro.net>) id 1PuaYt-00038l-7m
	for 9fans@9fans.net; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:09:08 +0000
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 19:58:45 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <cf3d1dd11e4d7e04d765c02bf1163de6@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <1DD87AAA-C5FE-42D6-9F07-F9FD16CDB24F@gmail.com>
References: <3b68e804f31f0d83373c265b16173370@gmx.de>
	<35a1bf3e40be73448a06094f4fdb169a@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<1DD87AAA-C5FE-42D6-9F07-F9FD16CDB24F@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] realemu
X-BeenThere: 9fans@9fans.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.9fans.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.9fans.net/options/9fans>,
	<mailto:9fans-request@9fans.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.9fans.net/private/9fans>
List-Post: <mailto:9fans@9fans.net>
List-Help: <mailto:9fans-request@9fans.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.9fans.net/listinfo/9fans>,
	<mailto:9fans-request@9fans.net?subject=subscribe>
Sender: 9fans-bounces@9fans.net
Errors-To: 9fans-bounces@9fans.net
X-GMX-Antivirus: 0 (no virus found)
X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (Sender is in whitelist: quanstro@quanstro.net);
 Detail=5D7Q89H36p4L00VTXC6D4q0N+AH0PUCnShX0FizdQl9RFZ0GCoYzuI/5tuj+6f1Bo33qJ
 FpAu0p8VGnOp3+cZQ==V1;

On Tue Mar  1 19:49:36 EST 2011, paurea@gmail.com wrote:
> > i'm sorry i've forgotten.  what's the problem with unemulated vesa?
> >
> Going back and forth to 16 bits does not make thing faster exactly. It will be
> even more fun in 64bits. 16-32-64...

is that an issue?  the only time that vesa bios is explicitly
called is during setup of the frame buffer, and for other
rare events like blanking the screen.

- erik

--upas-zvkrcqalyrfgwwrkrwirtdcfka--