From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
References: <20110715151535.GA2405@polynum.com>
	<20110715202157.GA5157@polynum.com>
	<CAP6exYK6da_9mVsbRhXf0x-PzUqGFDn4oxK5UE4fCxq31j7RxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110716080247.GA394@polynum.com> <4E225986.2050408@gmail.com>
	<20110717070120.GA539@polynum.com>
	<b373f3bc4a2ff836c828a8db702d6aaa@ladd.quanstro.net>
From: "ComeauAt9Fans@gmail.com" <comeauat9fans@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <b373f3bc4a2ff836c828a8db702d6aaa@ladd.quanstro.net>
Message-Id: <31D09D42-31D6-4F8A-9443-469B9FF5667F@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 11:52:51 -0400
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8C148a)
Subject: Re: [9fans] NUMA
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0387eb5e-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Jul 17, 2011, at 11:26 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:

>> BTW, if I understand correctly the purpose of the next C standard, I=20
>> guess there is no urge for kencc to support C99
>> since it is already a transitory only partially supported standard.
>=20
> ken's compiler supports the bits of c99 that people have found
> important/useful.  see /sys/src/cmd/cc/c99.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the inflection, but Isn't it so that C99 used "Ke=
n C" for some of its additions at the time?=