On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Russ Cox <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:rsc@swtch.com">rsc@swtch.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">


On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:27 PM, andrey mirtchovski<br>
&lt;<a href="mailto:mirtchovski@gmail.com">mirtchovski@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; serious question: can i have a link to the 9p implementation, pretty<br>
&gt; please? it doesn&#39;t appear in the module list on their website.<br>
<br>
There&#39;s no 9p implementation.  I thought about writing one<br>
a couple times, and I&#39;d love to do that (I want to write acme<br>
extensions in Go), but it hasn&#39;t been a priority.  Another thorny<br>
issue is what to name the package, since you can&#39;t start a<br>
package name with a digit.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I was wondering about that too and when I found out there was no 9P package for Go yet I created this project page: <a href="http://code.google.com/p/go9/">http://code.google.com/p/go9/</a>. I thought go9 was a reasonable compromise for the package name given we can&#39;t start with digits, though we can change that if anyone has a better idea.</div>

<div><br></div><div>There&#39;s no code in there yet because I just found out about Go a few hours ago and am still wrapping my head around it. I probably won&#39;t get something working for atleast a few weeks, so in the interim if someone wants to get started please pitch in and let&#39;s not duplicate work :-)</div>

<div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Anant</div><div><br></div></div>