From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <32279c2c064a969c8d9a805bd3fb3a4d@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:02:21 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <fe41879c0909171347t62f483fsec138a3a080778c5@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] "Blocks" in C
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 718a0aa8-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> ... In case anyone is wondering what they could be doing instead of feeding
> this massive thread more fatty foods.

there's lots of complaining on the list about the
content of the list.

it's not like there aren't good meaty issues to discuss.
what happened with either of the recently-reported
fossil lockup problems, for instance?

i mentioned that the pool library can act as a big
kernel lock a few weeks ago.  i don't know if anyone
has thoughts on how to deal with this.

it seems to me we deserve the list we create.

- erik