From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3279e1cac4e41327cb86a2b28ec29bdd@plan9.escet.urjc.es> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] plan 9 ports to unix (including libdraw) From: Fco.J.Ballesteros In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-mhhmvijltpgdfeckxaicizfdug" Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 10:50:18 +0200 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 73a064da-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-mhhmvijltpgdfeckxaicizfdug Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Doesnt have to be a difference if you don't want to have it. For us, our fileserver is also a regular cpuserver used just for the web, mail, and the like. But you could certainly use it to export your fossil to the network and nothing else; and it would behave like the old worm. In fact, we are not even exporting venti, since it runs only on a loopback interface to service fossil requests. --upas-mhhmvijltpgdfeckxaicizfdug Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by aquamar; Mon Oct 20 10:45:40 MDT 2003 Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 3BF8F19AF3; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 04:45:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.6.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id AB04019B2B; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 04:45:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 233CF19A9B; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 04:44:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp (granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp [157.16.101.69]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id DDD8019AF3 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 04:44:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] plan 9 ports to unix (including libdraw) From: okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp In-Reply-To: <5551b6dfb79934c8033b35ae14b86a7e@caldo.demon.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:45:17 +0900 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,NO_REAL_NAME version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) > i'd have thought the auth could happily coexist, though: So, you think that we don't worry about to have AUTH + Fosssil + Venti on a machine. I'm not a speciallist of computer security. I'd like to know what is the difference between old file server and new fossil + etc, the former was a standalone machine, and the latter can be a network machine. Kenji --upas-mhhmvijltpgdfeckxaicizfdug--