From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <32a4a48e4cd12dfabde4b1b4c1bc6ba3@plan9.escet.urjc.es> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu From: Fco.J.Ballesteros In-Reply-To: <200301152109.h0FL9Ww21064@augusta.math.psu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [9fans] fs (was: /rc/bin/C; hey, where'd my consoles go?) Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 08:57:11 +0100 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4246b138-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 Hi, I just couldn't resist to tell you that here we're now running using fossil with its partitions (as well as venti's) living in a raid made with fs(3). It's just great. We're now using a single server to service both auth and fs. All other machines are really stateless, which means that there's just a single machine to admin (no consolefs, more ups time, less points of failure, highly available alan parsons project mp3 service, ...) BTW, fossil seems to be quite robust. We had no panics, no aborts. It's a great file system.