From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <32a656c2050524100837091fe8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 02:08:34 +0900 From: Vester Thacker To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] the futility of #plan9 on irc In-Reply-To: <20050524164315.GA7530@mero.morphisms.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050523233359.GD14127@xware.cx> <32a656c2050524093932165200@mail.gmail.com> <20050524164315.GA7530@mero.morphisms.net> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 52721a02-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 5/25/05, William Josephson wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 01:39:12AM +0900, Vester Thacker wrote: > > It's a fact of life that people make mistakes. If we hit an > > 85 percent accuracy rate then we are doing great. Most > > weather forecasters don't do that well. >=20 > The thing is, if one doesn't know the answer, one > shouldn't make it up. It doesn't take complicated > statistical models to figure out which kernels have > SCSI and which don't. But the question really is then, is the service worth the risk? -vester