From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <32a656c20703060155o426c506co8c87a3f61c319d6f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:55:06 +0900 From: "Vester Thacker" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: PPP error: cannot write IP - link not up In-Reply-To: <1173119221.176185.34750@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1173084659.144385.71720@8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com> <1173119221.176185.34750@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 17b61042-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 3/6/07, Stevie_Lancaster wrote: > Thanks for your reply. Under /net there is already a directory ether0. > So I guess the device got binded there. Am I right? I believe it to mean that the device was recognized, but it does not mean that it was binded. > Are bind -a and bind -b in this case the same? Yes. Regards, Vester Thacker