From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <32a656c20703060347i7c83b199qe0e44c17e41d2e22@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue,  6 Mar 2007 20:47:22 +0900
From: "Vester Thacker" <vester.thacker@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: PPP error: cannot write IP - link not up
In-Reply-To: <d17a46fb1037001c6d073472dab7de69@coraid.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <32a656c20703060155o426c506co8c87a3f61c319d6f@mail.gmail.com>
	<d17a46fb1037001c6d073472dab7de69@coraid.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 17c69d72-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 3/6/07, erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com> wrote:
>
> i guess this is pedantic but, yes it does mean the device is bound
> into the namespace and in most cases you can send and receive
> raw ethernet frames.

I do not consider it pedantic at all. Thank you very much for the correction!
My apologies for the conceptual error.

--Vester