From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <32d987d50703171235y6ab3c28w7ca650260c1fd1ba@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:35:21 +0100
From: "Federico Benavento" <benavento@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Python cleverness
In-Reply-To: <0A23717C-0401-45EC-852A-D54113AD52FE@corpus-callosum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <13426df10701171309w65f11042l413cbcad22e7993f@mail.gmail.com>
	<0A23717C-0401-45EC-852A-D54113AD52FE@corpus-callosum.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 27e8ac0e-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

hola,

there are more recent python ports, one on sources:
/n/sources/contrib/uriel/ports/python2.4p9.tgz
and I think there is another more updated somewhere on mordor.

On 3/17/07, Jeff Sickel <jas@corpus-callosum.com> wrote:
> Has there been any progress on this?  I'd really like to see Python
> 2.4* or 2.5 on Plan 9 since a lot of the Python code I deal with on a
> regular basis these days requires a more recent version than we have
> out there on Plan 9.
>
> jas
>
>
> On Jan 17, 2007, at 3:09 PM, ron minnich wrote:
> >
> > But, if I can get this, we should have dynamic modules in Python, and
> > I get to check that box, since python and dynamic modules have become
> > very important to supercomputer applications writers. There, I said
> > that without grimacing :-)
>
>
>


-- 
Federico G. Benavento