From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <32d987d50711201557q597aefb5s73eeacb9db66b56f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:57:10 -0300 From: "Federico Benavento" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] sources/contrib In-Reply-To: <333c3d5c4dfff180853969bcfdf2b867@coraid.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <5d375e920711201336t6eaeba6fi35151042bd22194c@mail.gmail.com> <333c3d5c4dfff180853969bcfdf2b867@coraid.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 04ff1e0c-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > i have seen the case where applychanges was very slow. but using cphist > instead solved the problem. i can't explain why applychanges can be very > slow for me. I if I'm not mistaken, applychanges uses a single proc, where applylog has more workers. -- Federico G. Benavento