From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <32d987d50803201309h563052f2w508064b0a686eeb8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:09:31 -0300
From: "Federico G. Benavento" <benavento@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <676c3c4f0803201223i3a055c86if035520f97b937cf@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <84b81b7b75b737d2876d795fe7dc377e@proxima.alt.za>
	<676c3c4f0803201223i3a055c86if035520f97b937cf@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] EWOULDBLOCK in APE
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7d4dce26-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>  I think it's common on UNIX systems for EWOULDBLOCK to be a synonym for EAGAIN.

that's correct, at least acording to my POSIX man pages I have in the
posix-man contrib package.



--
Federico G. Benavento