From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.64.0910230816370.23231@malasada.lava.net>
References: <d50d7d460910230706j58181763n409b237ea4c23fb2@mail.gmail.com>
	<06a0be10-d05e-47f4-bebf-c9d9512de2b8@q14g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>
	<Pine.BSI.4.64.0910230816370.23231@malasada.lava.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:19:37 -0200
Message-ID: <32d987d50910231419p73446782j4f43fd5e121296ee@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Federico G. Benavento" <benavento@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] Two suggestions for ape (was: egrep for Plan9)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8f1ccfc4-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sources/contrib/fgb/rc/config

hacks configure and mostly gets it going

for egrep and fgrep
aux/stub /bin/egrep
bind /bin/grep /bin/egrep

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Tim Newsham <newsham@lava.net> wrote:
>> Jason: I understand your reasoning. However if two small fixes would
>> unblock execution of many projects' configure on Plan9 IMHO they are
>> worth making; they won't break anything.
>
> What if you just made a command "gnuconfig" which rewrote the
> configure script, fixing the minor defects, and ran the result?
> Or bound in a dummy "ls" and "egrep" before executing the real
> configure script?
> Lets keep the infection contained.
>
>> Thanks.
>> Dmitry
>
> Tim Newsham
> http://www.thenewsh.com/~newsham/
>
>



--
Federico G. Benavento