From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8ccc8ba41001090920i6ef8d5cag95cf97b1ab2a4f7d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4827a833118a99c807c1ff4eafeab696@plan9.bell-labs.com>
	<215A862D-2BDB-4AAB-9CA6-26134822D227@9srv.net>
	<623d06de1857264a5552b832f5157586@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<8ccc8ba41001090810vadfd8f5gb56be46a13cbab06@mail.gmail.com>
	<2e0447223c1d2fcdfab2c18d58da47c1@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<2781f021001090908j51d0b2a4j61ef0036168ec550@mail.gmail.com>
	<8ccc8ba41001090920i6ef8d5cag95cf97b1ab2a4f7d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat,  9 Jan 2010 21:38:42 -0200
Message-ID: <32d987d51001091538n71c2a094u7d65777bb1a5ab7d@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Federico G. Benavento" <benavento@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] parallels
Topicbox-Message-UUID: bc2bd47e-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

no apple-pcs here, but vmware seems to be the faster

On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org> wro=
te:
> Yep. I just wanted a version with full acpi support, and it
> seems that version 5 was what I wanted.
> that's handy to debug acpi code.
>
> but yes, it requires a mac.
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Joseph Stewart <joseph.stewart@gmail.com>=
 wrote:
>> Just to clarify... Parallels 5 requires a Mac. There are howerver, older
>> versions for M$ and Linux as well as their Server Virtualization product=
s.
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallels,_Inc.
>> -joe
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:14 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Just to confirm what Geoff said.
>>> >
>>> > Parallels 5 works like a charm with Plan 9.
>>> > Also, it seems to have full ACPI support, not that this is
>>> > important for Plan 9 yet.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 3:53 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net=
>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >> I've heard nothing but bad things about VirtualBox. Mostly from Pl=
an
>>> > >> 9
>>> > >> people(where the results have been uniformly bad), but also from
>>> > >> folks
>>> > >> trying to useother OSes. It seems the worst of the breed across th=
e
>>> > >> board.
>>> > >
>>> > > has anyone tried 9atom on virtualbox? =C2=A0i think there's a good =
chance
>>> > > virtualbox has some of the same issues i had with the ich7r.
>>>
>>> parallels requires a mac.
>>>
>>> - erik
>>>
>>
>>
>
>



--=20
Federico G. Benavento