From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <202b36ec0f14adf4b09e53052147ccc8@brasstown.quanstro.net> References: <20100325114948.GA7249@polynum.com> <31C84C15-2EE3-46CA-BE9F-48F20886ADF7@fastmail.fm> <202b36ec0f14adf4b09e53052147ccc8@brasstown.quanstro.net> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:58:35 -0300 Message-ID: <32d987d51003271058o5a4bd5awd2d206e39cfc8285@mail.gmail.com> From: "Federico G. Benavento" To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] Man pages for add-ons Topicbox-Message-UUID: f5cd0f90-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:54 PM, erik quanstrom wro= te: >> Also, is the size of the namespace list an issue? > > how does history(1) work in the face of a complicated namespace? > we get buy now because the rules are pretty simple. =C2=A0if you want to > find how the modifications to /386/lib/libc.a, you know where that > is. =C2=A0if you bind 100 packages on top of /386/lib, it becomes necessa= ry > to deconstruct namespaces continually. =C2=A0the abstraction of namespace > starts to break down. > this also breaks plumbing while debugging with acid unless quirky namespace is global, but then if it's global why do you need the binds! --=20 Federico G. Benavento