From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] spam rejection after reception does have limits
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:08:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <331a35e5f9d4b8aabb95e6e7c3e3675e@caldo.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00fd01c3855d$62e91100$b9844051@insultant.net>
> everyone has said about the limitations of import /mail/box but I don't
> see the current SMTP-based systems lasting a whole lot longer ...
i used to think that about XML
then again, there aren't whole conferences about SMTP
so you might be lucky. more seriously, what's more likely
is that Microsoft (say) will suddenly leap in to point out
that SMTP clearly doesn't work and therefore everyone ought
to use such-and-such a scheme that, curiously, works
best with their servers everywhere and where the protocol
is lightly documented and hard to match.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-28 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-27 22:46 ron minnich
2003-09-28 1:11 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 9:08 ` Charles Forsyth [this message]
2003-09-28 9:16 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 8:10 ` Lucio De Re
2003-09-28 8:59 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 9:42 ` Lucio De Re
2003-09-28 10:18 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 10:50 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 11:18 ` Lucio De Re
2003-09-28 11:44 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 11:05 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 11:47 ` Lucio De Re
2003-09-28 11:58 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 12:17 ` Lucio De Re
2003-09-29 9:14 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-09-29 9:37 ` boyd
2003-09-28 15:33 ` ron minnich
2003-09-28 15:39 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 17:12 ` ron minnich
2003-09-28 17:22 ` boyd
2003-09-28 10:16 ` Charles Forsyth
2003-09-28 10:23 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-29 3:23 ` salomo3
2003-09-29 3:32 ` boyd
2003-09-29 5:18 ` Lucio De Re
2003-09-29 9:18 ` boyd
2003-09-29 13:53 ` Joel Salomon
2003-09-29 9:14 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-09-29 9:13 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-09-29 9:44 ` SPAM: " Charles Forsyth
2003-09-29 15:21 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-09-29 16:02 ` Joel Salomon
2003-09-29 21:24 ` boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=331a35e5f9d4b8aabb95e6e7c3e3675e@caldo.demon.co.uk \
--to=forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).