From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <33226.138.89.145.238.1075789282.squirrel@www.infernopark.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] nice hardware for a cpu server
From: <vdharani@infernopark.com>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <E8C5FA76-55FB-11D8-ABD9-000A95E29604@nas.com>
References: <E8C5FA76-55FB-11D8-ABD9-000A95E29604@nas.com>
Cc: <fragment@nas.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Date: Tue,  3 Feb 2004 01:21:22 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: cbc3dd18-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> On Feb 2, 2004, at 6:20 PM, YAMANASHI Takeshi wrote:
>> Of course, everybody's oxen are full and there is no `share'
>> in them resulting the failure of inter-organization grid.
>>
>> There can be a intra-organization grid.  But what it differs
>> from a cluster?
>
> If latency isn't an issue (ha ha), geographically disparate
> organization sharing would be interesting.  Borrow cycles from an
> organization eight timezones away.
may be, in a way, recent viruses are good examples? :-)

regards
dharani