From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <338136843609fdd78da5af4cb2174946@9netics.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] historical clarification
Date: Tue,  7 Nov 2006 22:55:12 -0800
From: Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com>
In-Reply-To: <7871fcf50611072213j7f26456dxb1de74c891c5ad8b@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: dce0bad0-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>> are these two the same paper? any reason for difference in
>> titles?
>
> Compare "Plan 9: The Early Papers" (CSTR #158 at
> <http://plan9.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/cstr.html>, or
> <http://www.ecf.utoronto.ca/plan9/plan9doc/>) to the newer documents
> in /sys/doc .

unless i'm missing something, it doesn't explain the title difference;
perhaps the second source is wrong.