From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <341409a31670030ed4c2d4066c24846a@plan9.escet.urjc.es> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] cooked mouse mode. From: Gorka Guardiola Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:17:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2fabdaf0-eace-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 >> (previously avoided by having initmouse keep state in Mousectl >> for each logical/physical mouse-input file) > > setmousemode receives its own mousectl chan. > Is it ok in this case? Or do you think it's still wrong. > I I have just seen it. The state of the interpreter should be per mousectl. There is a global state which shouldn't be there in order to be able to cope with more than one mouse. G.