From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 16:05:43 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <349dd7ade9b0a18e1c5478e86525f3d0@brasstown.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: <51a37ed3.Cv/84Y4LD0KmwkHM%trebol55555@aol.com> References: <51a37ed3.Cv/84Y4LD0KmwkHM%trebol55555@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] cryptsetup Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5cbd7864-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > I have problems in a new installed system with cryptsetup and cwfs64. > > checktag pc=8694 cw "/dev/fs/fscache"w'/dev/fs/fsworm" (17cc8) tag /path=Tfile/49361; expected Tdir/49358 > > This is a fresh installation (not strange move-copy-dump-whatever) so this tags inconsistencies are worrying me, > because that can happen in the future again with important data. > > Anyone has have similar problems with cryptsetup and cwfs64? > Can I trust cryptsetup? > Is fossil more stable than cwfs64? I have read a lot in 9fans archive but I can't make any conclusion... > > Also, I don't find anything about cryptsetup outside 9front. Is it possible to use it in the original Plan9? did you do "ream main" first? i have no idea what cryptsetup is. - erik