From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:10:00 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <34cbb10e85c48ed92e6a843eddb70441@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <5b50616961c97fa5cb7a675a6892ce84@rei2.9hal>
References: <5b50616961c97fa5cb7a675a6892ce84@rei2.9hal>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Disk backup?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 36a0fda4-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue Mar 26 15:08:13 EDT 2013, cinap_lenrek@gmx.de wrote:
> because it is never visited by cwrecur(). the block isnt part of the
> active filesystem. its just sitting in the freelist. cwrecur() just
> walks from the root directory down following the trail of dirty
> modified blocks but it is not walking the freelist.

if it's not part of the active file system, then how could it be allocated
as part of a new file?

- erik