From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:26:15 -0500 To: skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com, 9fans@9fans.net, lucio@proxima.alt.za Message-ID: <34ec78772105c685c7761992ca10034d@coraid.com> In-Reply-To: References: <91774b6345d79748c720755d28a9f6ef@proxima.alt.za> <9e4fad988f611729bb064703d636be14@coraid.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Go and 21-bit runes (and a bit of Go status) Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8e0f0a9a-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Mon Dec 2 14:17:04 EST 2013, skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com wrote: > I believe one or two 9fans have provided systems for this purpose. > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:33 AM, erik quanstrom wrote: > > > > > > all this is moot unless we can get plan 9 integrated into go's automatic > > build system. is this doable? i have resources to make this happen if > > it is. if so, something's gone very wrong. usually the purpose of automatic build machines it to insure that things build and hopefully pass a few basic tests before the code can be checked in. i'd assumed that this was not working since clearly the plan 9 386 port is broken on a regular basis. if this can't be sorted out, then tracking mainline go is going to be quite hard, maybe even impractical. it's so much harder to get things fixed after code is merged than before. - erik