From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3521.199.98.17.58.1069369906.squirrel@wish>
In-Reply-To: <055d01c3afa9$7944ed40$b9844051@insultant.net>
References: <20031111001624.GA10112@ionkov.net>
     <f36a6d0599cdbac3fd9e21464c609297@caldo.demon.co.uk>
     <20031120143356.GA20235@ionkov.net>
     <1725.199.98.17.55.1069356471.squirrel@wish>
     <20031120204935.GD65844@cassie.foobarbaz.net>
     <055d01c3afa9$7944ed40$b9844051@insultant.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc trouble
From: "Joel Salomon" <salomo3@cooper.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:11:46 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 90ae9fec-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> they may be useful, but they're not general.
>
Thats a valid argument for not having the compiler know about them. We're
discussing the assembler. Or did you mean to argue their existence on the
chip? I can't see that adding *another* kluge atop IA32 can possibly hurt.

--Joel