From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:09:52 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <3543064d5adefdab43551617d33199f5@kw.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAOw7k5ii5PoYZnEbDeUuhR9GsgEEGt7i+XTQm7FR9+r=ENg=xw@mail.gmail.c>
References: <d67c46cd156233f61e9381a31c62269d@rei2.9hal>
	<d1c7d7362524b9375ba8e19c51dfd265@kw.quanstro.net>
	<CAOw7k5ii5PoYZnEbDeUuhR9GsgEEGt7i+XTQm7FR9+r=ENg=xw@mail.gmail.c>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] devmnt crash, fix.
Topicbox-Message-UUID: af29c2fc-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu Aug 23 12:48:17 EDT 2012, charles.forsyth@gmail.com wrote:

> No. It's not true that all sleeps might return spuriously (it might have
> been true in Unix, I can't remember).
> It's not true in Plan 9.

is this in /sys/doc/sleep.ps?  i think i'm missing it.

- erik