From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue,  8 Jun 2010 18:36:07 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <35443efbd3f6948a6bd18c9f66f2b3a1@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <4c0ec481.1P1U+7hQMas8saJj%yard-ape@telus.net>
References: <3717d8ce779c6f31d7e5c922eb34f00c@swcp.com>
	<146c961677a8e3b29413b0c39668652f@swcp.com>
	<4c0e86a6.p9p6O5x091i4Q2WY%yard-ape@telus.net>
	<f0b9297e21e2df31ee65e3eaf98f3c4b@coraid.com>
	<519d8929becf1681faebe475e02b9d9e@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<4c0ec481.1P1U+7hQMas8saJj%yard-ape@telus.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Sed label handling inconsistency
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 30f85a5c-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>
> > > without having access to a unix machine right now, i'm guessing that
> > > the code at jtcommon should replace
> > > 	if(*cp == '\0')
> > > with
> > > 	if(*cp == '\0' || *cp == ';')
> > >
> > > at lines 428.  similar change at line 328.
> >
> > sorry, fat fingers.  428 and 438.
> >
> > - erik
> Actually 328 is what I've got.  But no change in behaviour after recompile.

the plan 9 version works as you expect it should, and it's
not a 32-bit rune problem because that works on my system.
by looking at the differences between the p9p and plan 9
version, you should be able to find the problem rather
rapidly.  there's not much code involved.

- erik