From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2)
In-Reply-To: <5508fb40668038e8e325861b39070dcd@proxima.alt.za>
References: <5508fb40668038e8e325861b39070dcd@proxima.alt.za>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <35553ab2ecc60e6729e502161bad3131@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp
Subject: Re: [9fans] factotum & invalid entries
Date: Mon,  7 Feb 2005 14:42:07 +0900
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 40b8a620-eace-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> Would anything break if factotum actually "delkey"ed the failed entry?
>

Russ will answer but I would like to say.
I think nothing break but I want the key is kept untouched only adding
disabled flag
at the beginning.
because the disabled key is useful to see what was wrong.
And I want, the disabled key is replaced by new one when I add new key.
Then I can edit factotum without changing the order.

Kenji Arisawa