From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Staal To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:26:08 +0200 Message-ID: <3681698.qAT3IkqOYy@krypton> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.7 (Linux/4.0.2-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.7; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1c66fd9a5499318dfc14634e17ed5aaa@styx> References: <1c66fd9a5499318dfc14634e17ed5aaa@styx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: Re: [9fans] Ports tree for Plan 9 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5262353e-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Tuesday 12 May 2015 01:45:13 mveety@mveety.com wrote: > Thanks Jens! I can add you to the bitbucket if you wish so you can > contribute at your leisure. Also, if anyone else wants commit access, > just ask. :) (I think bitbucket has some dumb limited commit bit > thing though. Hopefully I'll get off it soon.) > > -- > Veety cool my e-mail adress used for these things is staal1978@gmail.com I just started watching the repo. Some form questions: * should categories be listed according to groups similar to OpenBSD ports? (got some stuff for "archivers", "shell", "graphics" and "lang" ... and perhaps a few more) * for APE packages (for example libraries that depend on other APE libraries), should this be a specific sub-category? for example ape/graphics/[package] ? some binaries, libraries and headers should probably be installed in /rc/bin/ape, $objtype/bin/ape/, $objtype/lib/ape and /sys/include/ape/ * Config/ports.conf is "catagory" intentional or a typo? I will see when I have time to play with this... I am eager to though :)