From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <36fe3982fad9a0242c53d65752a361b4@caldo.demon.co.uk>
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] admin with fossil?
In-Reply-To: <20031010140614.GB2749@tfraser.cs.umd.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:46:04 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6bcf3b96-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>>the way of the future.  Which filesystem is more appropriate for my
>>stand-alone terminal, fossil or kfs?

fossil/venti should be fine.  i've certainly switched my thinkpad
from kfs to fossil without fuss.  it backs up to venti on the
same device, mainly so i can recover the fossil more easily if required.

functionally, fossil has got long names (sometimes useful) but
more important, snapshots and archives, which kfs hasn't.