From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 06:01:12 -0800
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <37c4a121a3f17639ccc896b121800139@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAOw7k5g9yFbveYHtRTDdxM52K8JhgYzAa1=pcApC7A7UcbRhHQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E9D002A0-CF5A-4059-96F9-9365F67D119B@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
	<0F748B67-FB11-464C-84FA-66B4E0B29918@9.offblast.org>
	<44900c0d4896622fa8a9411b05efe730@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<7A132462-4747-471A-A4BF-D9381E38A4EA@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
	<4c37cf728d5b0e7ae4ebd3c2e0c2cee4@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<D6B3E614-CD6D-443E-8389-C7258D90954F@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
	<c7f91b490366efbf73cc704d9f3bc4e1@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<CAOw7k5g9yFbveYHtRTDdxM52K8JhgYzAa1=pcApC7A7UcbRhHQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] protection against resource exhaustion
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3bd3df66-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue Jan 27 02:49:44 PST 2015, charles.forsyth@gmail.com wrote:

> On 27 January 2015 at 04:22, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>
> > this isn't because [linux oom killer] isn't thoughtfully and
> > well built,
> >
>
> it's actually fairly stupid.

the proof that a non-stupid one could be written for me would be in the writing.
there are a lot of smart people who care about the matter not doing this.  :-)

- erik