From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 06:01:12 -0800 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <37c4a121a3f17639ccc896b121800139@brasstown.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: References: <0F748B67-FB11-464C-84FA-66B4E0B29918@9.offblast.org> <44900c0d4896622fa8a9411b05efe730@brasstown.quanstro.net> <7A132462-4747-471A-A4BF-D9381E38A4EA@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp> <4c37cf728d5b0e7ae4ebd3c2e0c2cee4@brasstown.quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] protection against resource exhaustion Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3bd3df66-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Tue Jan 27 02:49:44 PST 2015, charles.forsyth@gmail.com wrote: > On 27 January 2015 at 04:22, erik quanstrom wrote: > > > this isn't because [linux oom killer] isn't thoughtfully and > > well built, > > > > it's actually fairly stupid. the proof that a non-stupid one could be written for me would be in the writing. there are a lot of smart people who care about the matter not doing this. :-) - erik