From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <37d3faed5a5fe3f0e856ee5d6367ee0c@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu,  8 Jun 2006 23:09:08 -0500
From: quanstro@quanstro.net
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc on plan9
In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60606080710n4252680fp3720965689e6342a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6326ffce-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu Jun  8 09:11:58 CDT 2006, leimy2k@gmail.com wrote:
> GNU Fortran is actually fairly well caught up with F95 at least.  I've
> seen traffic on the apple scitech list saying that f2c is completely
> inadequate for modern fortran codes.

modern fortran.  two words that should never share the space between
the double-space and the period.

- erik