From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <38a2cbeff1bce22286af152898b682a2@hamnavoe.com>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: Richard Miller <9fans@hamnavoe.com>
Date: Thu,  5 Apr 2018 22:33:19 +0100
In-Reply-To: <BA4D9781-54BA-43C0-AA71-6DC047739727@quintile.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 on Pi 3B+
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d3c4835c-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> do you any feeling why plan9 sees only 200Mbps ether?
>
> is it the stack design, how plan9 accesses the hardware? or maybe the 300Mbps quoted is only when using jumbo frames?

Jumbo frames might help if the bottleneck was in the ip stack,
but I think the limiting factor is the Plan 9 usb infrastructure,
which is written more for simplicity than for maximum speed.