From: vdharani@infernopark.com
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Ad link
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:59:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39376.128.107.253.38.1111741146.squirrel@www.infernopark.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bc166c91725d1028a2c3e6d8f9ed61d@coraid.com>
> And here's a quick summary of the difference.
>
> EtherDrive storage blades use AoE the talk to block storage.
> They are not nas boxes.
> They are like sans only each drive can be seen on the network.
> Each blade is a complete server with its own Ethernet interface.
> The shelf has no common equipment; just power supply and a couple of
> fans.
> Blades can be raided across any number of shelves; you can
> stripe 30 blades together if you wish while the shelf only
> holds 10 blades.
> You never have to spill a file system like using nas boxes;
> just keep adding shelves and making your file system bigger.
>
> I don't want to get into a commercial for EtherDrive storage blades,
> so you might want to read the white paper.
any reason why it is not AoIP (i mean ATA over IP)? that way it would be
even more flexible. i am sure you have a reason behind but would like to
know why you chose not to use ip. i think a skinny IP/UDP is a good choice
too. i guess it is time to read the coraid paper!
thanks
dharani
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-25 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-23 17:04 Brantley Coile
2005-03-24 8:58 ` Matthias Wenzel
2005-03-24 10:51 ` Charles Forsyth
2005-03-24 15:17 ` Brantley Coile
2005-03-25 8:59 ` vdharani [this message]
2005-03-25 15:25 ` Brantley Coile
2005-03-24 13:45 ` vdharani
2005-03-24 8:37 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2005-03-24 15:03 ` Brantley Coile
2005-03-24 15:08 Fwd: " Brantley Coile
2005-03-24 15:54 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-03-24 21:15 ` Sam
2005-03-24 22:31 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-03-24 22:47 ` Russ Cox
2005-03-25 15:34 ` Brantley Coile
2005-03-26 0:00 ` geoff
2005-03-26 0:19 ` Russ Cox
2005-03-25 8:51 ` Fwd: " vdharani
2005-03-25 15:27 ` Brantley Coile
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39376.128.107.253.38.1111741146.squirrel@www.infernopark.com \
--to=vdharani@infernopark.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).