From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 08:34:02 +0000 From: Alt Message-ID: <39777BBC.D179F13E@cybercafe.com.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200007181711.NAA06117@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Microsoft Topicbox-Message-UUID: e82eb706-eac8-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 mike@x.bell-labs.com wrote: > What got them in trouble was not integrating a browser into Windows per se, > but the fact that they did that in order to extend their monopoly in OS's > (Windows) into the browser market. > > Now if Plan 9 were running on 90% of the desktops in the world, perhaps we > should be cautious about integrating web access into it. Somehow, I don't > think this is a big concern right now! :-) Hi. Yes, your words are funny. However, I think that Plan9 could serve as a ground of best OS for native users. It (Plan9) have everything which is requaired for it. Just made an envirement (KDE like) + some hardware drivers, and you got better OS for native users. Plan9 enough flexible to be adapted for such tasks. Just one problem: nobody like to do such envirement. And me to. :) Bye. --the Alternative.