From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3A1ED86E.82426D1D@gsyc.escet.urjc.es> From: Francisco J Ballesteros MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Crazy idea... or a new project? References: <20001124190548.3A130199EE@mail.cse.psu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 22:06:54 +0100 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 31b29780-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 I was talking about booting a kernel with the bare minimum to be able to run a couple of user programs to link a new kernel. Then reboot. But perhaps not a good idea. Because at least IDE and ether drivers should be in place. rob pike wrote: > > > Another way could be to be able to link the kernel > > with device drivers before loading it, and keep > > the kernel just with devices used. I think that > > could be done by making each driver provide a > > (user) program to check if the device is there, > > and linking a second kernel depending on what's > > there. > > You don't have a user program running when you're trying > to boot the kernel. > > -rob