From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: "Douglas A. Gwyn" <gwyn@arl.army.mil>
Message-ID: <3AE84488.E9D92513@arl.army.mil>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <20010425020422.4BCEA19B10@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] X on Plan 9
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 16:40:12 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 91aa246e-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> >I am confused on this issue. Plan9 generally makes claims along the lines of
> >"easier to reason about..." and "[cleaner/simpler] programming style"
okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp wrote:
> If you are serious, you can read many papers comming with Plan 9 distribution,

Or some of the classic papers in computer science, such as Hoare's
"Communicating Sequential Processes".