From: "Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] threads in Plan 9
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:24:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AEA3FC0.84E5BBED@null.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010427214248.B923B19A02@mail.cse.psu.edu>
forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk wrote:
> it is fascinating how close they skirt to undecidability.
> is that good or bad? i can't decide.
Why would it be bad? Any sufficiently interesting system
must have undecidable constructs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-30 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-27 21:39 forsyth
2001-04-30 9:24 ` Douglas A. Gwyn [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-28 16:00 Richard Miller
2001-04-27 20:06 jmk
2001-04-27 19:09 [9fans] Awk or Limbo ? geoff.9fans
2001-04-27 19:23 ` [9fans] threads in Plan 9 Scott Schwartz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3AEA3FC0.84E5BBED@null.net \
--to=dagwyn@null.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).