From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3AF8D73E.999321CB@edb.ericsson.se>
From: "Franklin Robert Araujo Fran€a" <franklin.robert@edb.ericsson.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Performance
References: <20010508174101.BFC6919A03@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed,  9 May 2001 08:35:58 +0300
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9c26d6f8-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

In fact, I had studied about Plan 9 performance against Linux and Sun OS. I
have a paper with all the results. That paper is one of the results of my
Master Thesis. The advisor for this Thesis was Professor Ph.D Celio
Guimaraes. I'll send the results for this list as soon as possible.

Thanks.

Franklin.


presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:

> Not that i know of
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: [9fans] Performance
> Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 10:42:15 -0700
> From: "Fariborz 'Skip' Tavakkolian" <fst@real.com>
> Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
>
> Are there any published performance numbers more recent than those
> mentioned in 9 and net papers? Any for typical PC platforms compared
> to Linux or FreeBSD?